Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Evans vs Max Purcell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Evans vs Purcell analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Evans vs Max Purcell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Evans 1 - 0 Purcell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Evans has won 51.63% of points on his second serve, while Purcell has won 52.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Evans, in recent form, has won 49.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Purcell has won 45.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.05% and 26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Evans has saved 60.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Purcell has saved 61.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Evans has won 35% of matches played (W/L 14/ 26), with Purcell winning 41.07% (W/L 23/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 47/ 55). Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 205/ 142), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 27.78% of matches (W/L 5/ 13), where as Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 34.62% of matches (W/L 9/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Evans winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Evans winning 2 and Purcell winning 0. The last match between Evans and Purcell was at the Loughborough Challenger, 22-05-2018, First, I.hard with Daniel Evans getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Evans and Purcell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Evans winning 0 times and Purcell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Evans winning 0, and Purcell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 150.7 while Purcell has played against players with an average rank of 186.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Evans has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Purcell has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Evans has converted 28.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Purcell has converted 31.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
62
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
94
Rank
40
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
60% (552-374)
Career Total W/L
57% (275-206)
26% (5-14)
YTD W/L
38% (9-15)
$4,846,130
Career Prize Money
$1,046,175
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Evans | Max Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:4:54 | 1:4:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (34/48) | 61% (38/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (30/34) | 63% (24/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (8/14) | 46% (11/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (27/62) | 21% (10/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Evans | Max Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 26% (5/14) | 38% (9/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (17/31) | 38% (25/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (219/259) | 46% (288/342) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 35% (6/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 62 | 176 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:12:58 | 1:52:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 186.58 | 213.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (860/1536) | 57% (1123/1978) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (607/860) | 71% (797/1123) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (349/676) | 53% (449/855) |
| BPs Won% Total | 28% (35/124) | 32% (44/139) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (540/1555) | 33% (626/1901) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 22% (2/7) | 36% (4/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (5/17) | 38% (8/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 10% (1/10) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 14% (1/7) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 57% (7/4) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 43% (7/3) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 24% (17/4) |
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
114)
20
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Hugo Grenier
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Daniel Evans
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Max Purcell
64%
(
96 of
149)
1st Serve %
52%
(
82 of
157)
10
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
53 of
82)
57%
(
30 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
34%
(
51 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
62 of
157)
160
Total Points Won
146
|
6-2 6-2 3-6 4-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Max Purcell
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Remy Bertola
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
James Kent Trotter
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
10
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Fajing Sun
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Max Purcell
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Max Purcell
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Marcos Giron
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Evans Vs Purcell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
